-
 KDE-Apps.org Applications for the KDE-Desktop 
 GTK-Apps.org Applications using the GTK Toolkit 
 GnomeFiles.org Applications for GNOME 
 MeeGo-Central.org Applications for MeeGo 
 CLI-Apps.org Command Line Applications 
 Qt-Apps.org Free Qt Applications 
 Qt-Prop.org Proprietary Qt Applications 
 Maemo-Apps.org Applications for the Maemo Plattform 
 Java-Apps.org Free Java Applications 
 eyeOS-Apps.org Free eyeOS Applications 
 Wine-Apps.org Wine Applications 
 Server-Apps.org Server Applications 
 apps.ownCloud.com ownCloud Applications 
--
-
 KDE-Look.org Artwork for the KDE-Desktop 
 GNOME-Look.org Artwork for the GNOME-Desktop 
 Xfce-Look.org Artwork for the Xfce-Desktop 
 Box-Look.org Artwork for your Windowmanager 
 E17-Stuff.org Artwork for Enlightenment 
 Beryl-Themes.org Artwork for the Beryl Windowmanager 
 Compiz-Themes.org Artwork for the Compiz Windowmanager 
 EDE-Look.org Themes for your EDE Desktop 
--
-
 Debian-Art.org Stuff for Debian 
 Gentoo-Art.org Artwork for Gentoo Linux 
 SUSE-Art.org Artwork for openSUSE 
 Ubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Ubuntu 
 Kubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Kubuntu 
 LinuxMint-Art.org Artwork for Linux Mint 
 Arch-Stuff.org Art And Stuff for Arch Linux 
 Frugalware-Art.org Themes for Frugalware 
 Fedora-Art.org Artwork for Fedora Linux 
 Mandriva-Art.org Artwork for Mandriva Linux 
--
-
 KDE-Files.org Files for KDE Applications 
 OpenTemplate.org Documents for OpenOffice.org
 GIMPStuff.org Files for GIMP
 InkscapeStuff.org Files for Inkscape
 ScribusStuff.org Files for Scribus
 BlenderStuff.org Textures and Objects for Blender
 VLC-Addons.org Themes and Extensions for VLC
--
-
 KDE-Help.org Support for your KDE Desktop 
 GNOME-Help.org Support for your GNOME Desktop 
 Xfce-Help.org Support for your Xfce Desktop 
--
openDesktop.orgopenDesktop.org:   Applications   Artwork   Linux Distributions   Documents    LinuxDaily.com    Linux42.org    OpenSkillz.com   
 
Artwork
News
Groups
Knowledge
Events
Forum
People
Jobs
Register
Login



Sponsoring


-
- Content .- Fans  . 

New KDE Mascot revisited

  

KDE Wallpaper 1024x768

Score 61%
New KDE Mascot revisited
zoom


Downloads:  218
Submitted:  Sep 27 2006

Description:

Before you mod this down, please read.

This is kind of an "pseudoartistic political statement".

A few days ago, some medicore artwork was uploaded to kde-look.org, labeled "new kde mascot", consisting of collages of Konqui, the KDE logo and an female asian fotomodel, who was clothed in some frottee-like bikini (e.g. as in "not nude")

This imagery sparked the complaints of alleged christian folks, who requested that artwork to be removed, and who told that "nude imagery" was offensive to their beliefes.

Remember: Lots of things can be offensive to other systems of belief - "danish carricatures" are only one example that occured not too long ago. Also remember that nude or erotic imagery is as old as mankind.

Ultimately, the "New KDE Mascot" artwork vanished mysteriously from KDE-look.org, without being modded down. This should be an outrage for a community that builds its existance on ideas of freedom and humanism.

This wallpaper should remind us to protect the freedoms we have, against everyone who wants to remove them because of "security concerns", "personal belief" or any other reasons. The burka woman represents what we would get if people with an even less open mind about females in pictures would want and get a removal of works depicting women on kde-look, the rusty gear stands for what would become of KDE-Look, KDE and OSS if basic freedom would be denied on a regular basis.

Freedom starts at home. Freedom starts here.



License:
Based on a photo by "koldo" (http://www.flickr.com/people/koldo/)
Based on a photo by "flattop341" (http://www.flickr.com/people/flattop341/)

Released under the Terms of the CC Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 License


Send to a friend
Subscribe
Other  Artwork  from DocTomoe
Report inappropriate content



-

 good motivation

 
 by caminoix on: Sep 27 2006
 
Score 50%

i voted up because i probably couldn't agree more with you. the so-called western world is unbelievably egocentric and closed despite all the slogans it keeps repeating without at all seeing that they're the first not to follow them.
although, i'm afraid most people will just pass by this mascot and think you're a muslim terrorist trying to undermine their sacred freedom.
btw. i hate it when people say "muslim terrorists" - it's just raising aggression against a religion none the less peaceful than buddhism or christianity. a tremendous ignorance.
my post's prolly too long to be read, too :/


nemerle - the best language for mono | kate os | source mage
Reply to this

-

 Agreed

 
 by sabaal on: Sep 27 2006
 
Score 50%

Voted up. Couldn't agree more. :)

If something offends you, it's as simple as ignoring/avoiding it. Besides, I don't see any Christian groups getting pornographic websites shut down, so why take down a simple image?

I'm not anti-religious or anything, but if you ask me, the moment your religion starts getting in the way of my rights is the moment that I stop caring about anything you believe in.


Whoever said "Freedom isn't free" has never used Linux.
Reply to this

-

 Re: Agreed

 
 by ArneBab on: Apr 7 2009
 
Score 50%

I would sign that and add: The moment religion hinders giving people as much freedom as possible without obstructing others freedom is the moment I stop caring in your beliefs.

Most of our rights and restrictions were created by religious people, so there are still many leftover rights which restrict personal freedom on the base of religious morale.


Being unpolitical
means being political
without realizing it
- Arne Babenhauserheide ( http://draketo.de )

Reply to this

-
.

 A doubt

 
 by peroxid on: Sep 28 2006
 
Score 50%

Are you stating anyone can upload whatever he deserves to kde-look?


Reply to this

-
.

 Re: A doubt

 
 by DocTomoe on: Sep 28 2006
 
Score 50%

No - There should be boundaries, defined by the law governing the area the site owner operates from. This law usually has reasons for denying particular imagery (sodonomy, kiddie porn, etc...). I'd also believe that KDE-Look should not alow hard porn (eg. closeup of genitals doing what genitals usually do).

Besides of that, I believe there should be either a strict guideline what to remove (e.g. depiction of women in suggestive poses, as there are literaly hundreds on KDE-Look), or no restrictions at all.

KDE-Look surely has greater problems than appeasing religious nutheads. Just think of all the work based on propritary photos that is released under the GPL :|


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: A doubt

 
 by DocTomoe on: Sep 28 2006
 
Score 50%

My English has seen better days... In Germany, "Sodomie" means zoophilia, and has nothing to do with homosexual content. I didn't mean to offend gay people.


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: Re: A doubt

 
 by blaster999 on: Sep 28 2006
 
Score 50%

According to this: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sodomy sodomy may mean:


  • Anal sex

  • Non-vaginal male-female or male-male intercourse of any type

  • Any act of 'abnormal' or 'unnatural' intercourse, especially anal intercourse or bestiality.



AFAIK, by biblical canons, any sex position, except missionary, is considered sodomy. So, if you have ever tried "doggystyle", "cowgirl", "69" or any other position, you're a sodomist to the true christians...


It is not the size of the hammer that counts. It's how you wield it.
Reply to this

-
.

 Re: Re: A doubt

 
 by peroxid on: Sep 28 2006
 
Score 50%

I feel very sorry, exactly between sorry and astonished. Sorry because this talk has place in kde-look and ahtonished because people do not see this is not the place for this. I am not a founder of kde-look, nor I've been here from the begining. Just I've been visiting this site 2 years and I've contributed a little bit. But I believe (read: believe) this is just a kde/linux artwork site.

I do not want this wonderfuul place of share made another photo-upload place, or political battle forum. You talk about "appeasing religious nutheads"... WTF? I am openly atheist and I see this off-topic.

And please, other errors are not excuse. A OT content do not make the next OT good. Nature, landscape have a very little, little excuse: Thay can be included in a linux distribution. The artistic nude stuff (who said porn is plain stupid)... again, WTF?

I do not see bad a splash with a male background: OK (see thorsel). Nothing bad with anime/hentai chicks (see blacktiger), or a tit, or an ass. But things are getting crazy (no names here, we all know)


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: Re: A doubt

 
 by DocTomoe on: Sep 29 2006
 
Score 50%

So pictures "suitable" for inclusion in distributions are ok? Don't you think this is in a way hypocrisy? Hypothetically, would you be ok with those pictures if someone made a distro called "Chicknux", based on the Linux kernel, KDE and lots of erotic/nude imagery? The kind of pictures you and some other folks detest would be perfectly suitable for "Chicknux", don't you think? Would it *then* be ok to post them here?

I'd bet even then you and others would rage a war on artistic photography.

I am sorry I offended your belief system by falsely putting you in the christian corner. It's kind of a generalization: Most people standing up on such content prominently have flown the banners of their cults, and all to often those were the banners of fundamental christianity.

Let democratic principles decide: Use the moderation system for sorting out inappropriate non-criminal imagery. Anything other is bigotry.


Reply to this

-
.

 Re: Re: Re: Re: A doubt

 
 by peroxid on: Sep 29 2006
 
Score 50%

If that chicknux exists and the content is related to it I'll have to shut up mi mouth. But there is not that distro so...

You may lost that bet. I like nudity, I own and see porn, I have nothing again it. So dificult is to understand I am talking about off-topic content?

If someone says stupid things based on religion, you should ignore them, and not to lose the point here: again off-topic.

I got your las point, you are right. The community moderation is the way to get content in and out. I just want to remember what this place is for.


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

 
 by DocTomoe on: Sep 29 2006
 
Score 50%

How can you say Chicknux doesn't exist? Basically, now it does. Stay tuned for an official announcement :)

I really wished you were right and my initial post were off-topic. I'd be glad I could ignore religious fanatics. Unfortunaley, these fanatics seem to have a voice loud enough to get this sites administrator to remove artwork if they feel "offended". And then, I refuse to ignore this. Beware of the beginnings, who knows what will be "offensive" tomorrow. Not that off-topic, ain't I?

BTW.: I think that "new kde mascot" artwork actually had a relation to KDE, as it featured the current mascot.


Reply to this

-

 The difference

 
 by Brandybuck on: Sep 30 2006
 
Score 50%
BrandybuckBrandybuck
ICS
Home
-
David Johnson 1

ICS
United States of America, Mountain View
Last visit May 3 2012
0 Friends
2 Groups

More info
Send a message
Add as friend
Other contents
--

The difference between one tribe and another: one tribe will complain about seeing female nudity, but the other will kill you for it. I greatly prefer the world of the former, where people have the freedom to express their opinions.

The tribes in Western Civilization have learned to live together despite our disagreements. The burka does not come from this culture.


Reply to this

-

 no

 
 by janet on: Sep 30 2006
 
Score 50%

I don't believe in any religion but I believe that you trample on women's feelings by posting pictures showing women as lust objects for men on kde-look.org. It has nothing to do with nudity or burka women or freedom, it is a matter of fairness and respect.


Want excellent hardware recognition and an easy way to install Debian Sid? Get KANOTIX!
Reply to this

-

 Re: no

 
 by DocTomoe on: Sep 30 2006
 
Score 50%

I seriously don't see how I could trample on the feeling of a woman who willingly has accepted on posing for a photo.


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: no

 
 by janet on: Oct 1 2006
 
Score 50%

The other women's visiting kde-look.org....


Want excellent hardware recognition and an easy way to install Debian Sid? Get KANOTIX!
Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: Re: no

 
 by logixoul on: Oct 11 2006
 
Score 50%

The only woman shown as a 'lust object' is the posted one. This has nothing to do with womankind in general.


Reply to this

-

 Re: no

 
 by Jourdin on: Jan 6 2009
 
Score 50%

Wow...

If you don't like something do go there. This goes back to the 10 commandments as well which boils down
to do 'Don't harm anyone else unless they are threatning your life', which includes not killing them. Known which
commandment you would break if you did?

Women has posed for pictures of them selves for the same reason men want to look at them. If you tell a woman she
looks like hell she'll be offended. Why? Because attractive people are percieved as better partners hence a
women do want to show off to attract partners. Simple and also shows why women has a whole lot of power. And why
men want to cover them up... Why feminist goes to this trouble as well is a weird biological quirk... remove competition?

If the woman in the first artwork wanted to be photographed she surely didn't intend it to be eyes only, it'd
go against her biological need of attracting attractive partners for her self.

And using religion is the oldest way of controlling a group of people, shouldn't we have moved beyond those
old ways soon. Are we still a bunch of uneducated cavepeople? Pathetic...

At any rate, Linux is about choice as long as you don't break the law. Very good rule of common sense I say and why
not let that rule here as well? As long as noone breaks the commonly agreed law of where they live and the servers
reside it should be allowed.
And no religious mumbo jumbo, has to be an approved law of the country you actually live in.


Reply to this

Add commentBack






-

-
How do you like Plasma 5?
 The best KDE Desktop ever.
 Definitely a nice improvement.
 Not decided yet. Haven't tried it yet.
 I do not like some of the changes.
 KDE is taking the wrong way.
 I am still sticking with KDE 3.5.
 I have no opinion, but wanted to vote anyway.

resultmore




 
 
 Who we are
Contact
More about us
Frequently Asked Questions
Register
Twitter
Blog
Explore
Artwork
Jobs
Knowledge
Events
People
Updates on identi.ca
Updates on Twitter
Facebook App
Content RSS   
News RSS   
Discussion RSS   
Events RSS   

Participate
Groups
Forum
Add Artwork
Public API
About KDE-Look.org
Legal Notice
Spreadshirt Shop
CafePress Shop
Advertising
Sponsor us
Report Abuse
 

Copyright 2001-2014 KDE-Look.org Team  
All rights reserved. KDE-Look.org is not liable for any content or goods on this site.
All contributors are responsible for the lawfulness of their uploads.
KDE and K Desktop Environment are trademarks of KDE e.V.